Let’s compare these two systems according to their key parameters.
Structure and functionality
When setting up a merchant account with an acquiring bank, you enter into a direct relationship with it and receive a dedicated account upon approval. A payment facilitator “hires” a master account from a bank and “rents out” its functionality to sub-merchants.
Application and onboarding
To get approval for a traditional merchant account, you will have to wait several weeks, during which your application undergoes a thorough, lengthy underwriting process. With a PayFac, it takes hours or at worst days.
Fees
PayFacs usually charge a percentage per transaction. The owners of merchant accounts are subject to more complex fee structures with monthly or annual fees, setup fees, statement fees, and whatnot.
Risk handling
Businesses with an individual merchant account assume direct liability for fraud and chargebacks, and must resolve disputes and implement preventive measures themselves. PayFacs deal with compliance, risk management, and fraud detection, however other liabilities still rest with sub-merchants.
So, which model is better? It depends on the size of your enterprise and its transaction volume. For startups and small businesses with no expertise in the payment processing field but an aspiration to kick off accepting payments as soon as possible, a payment facilitator is just what the doctor ordered. Large organizations with high sales volumes that want greater control over their finances and can benefit from potentially lower fees down the line will find a traditional merchant account more suitable.